The Australian National University

AUSTRALIA & JAPAN IN THE REGION

Forum of the Australia-Japan Research Centre (AJRC)
Crawford School of Public Policy


Volume 4, No 1, January 2016 View in your web browser

Abe’s arrows still missing the mark

By Nobumasa Akiyama, Hitotsubashi University


Photo by Moyan Brenn, Flickr

2015 could be remembered as a glorious year for Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

As Abe ended 2014 with a surprise visit to Yasukuni Shrine — provoking harsh criticism from close neighbours — many anticipated that the most daunting task for Abe in 2015 would be to properly manage issues regarding the war history.

Abe expressed his remorse on the 70th anniversary of the end of the Second World War in various speeches at the Australian parliament, the Asia–Africa Conference in Indonesia, the joint session of the US Congress and Senate, and on the commemoration day of 15 August.

Abe expressed his remorse on the 70th anniversary of the end of the Second World War in various speeches.

The speeches were largely well-received by international audiences, though China and South Korea, as well as Abe’s supporters on the right, did not seem satisfied. Yet Abe avoided making major concessions to China and South Korea and was still able to realise the trilateral Japan–South Korea–China summit meeting in October. Japan’s bilateral relationships with China and South Korea are slowly moving forward as mutual strategic and economic needs arise.

Beyond the history issue, Abe made remarkable achievements on unpopular policies including new security legislation and the conclusion of Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations, all while maintaining a relatively high approval rate. Behind his success there was a great deal of pragmatic political calculations both at home and abroad.


Photo by Global Panorama, Flickr

His biggest political accomplishment was the reinterpretation of Article 9 of the Constitution and the subsequent enactment of new security legislation. The reinterpretation allows the Japanese government to exercise the right of collective self-defence, though only in a limited manner. The new legislation provides a more sound foundation for Japan to take on a larger role in its alliance with the United States and to further its commitment to international peace operations. In light of China’s recent assertiveness, particularly in South China Sea, this shift in Japan’s security policy was welcomed by not only by the United States, but also by Asian countries who hope to enhance their security cooperation with Japan.

At home Abe faced serious political challenges. A July survey of constitutional lawyers showed that the overwhelming majority of respondents considered the reinterpretation of Article 9 and the subsequent security legislation to be unconstitutional. Other surveys indicated that the public was also cautious about changing Japan’s basic legal framework for security. And tens of thousands engaged in public protests against the new security policy.

Another major achievement for Abe was the conclusion of TPP negotiations.

Abe’s successful foreign policy activity contrasts sharply with Japan’s economic landscape. The ‘three arrows’ of Abenomics announced in 2012 have not put the Japanese economy back on a secure, steady growth track. Although the Nikkei index recovered to 20,000 yen (about US$162) in June, an increase of more than 20 per cent from the beginning of the year, the rate of GDP growth was negative in two consecutive quarters. More worrying for Abe is the fact that currently 80 per cent of people do not believe there has been an economic recovery. The government also plans to increase the consumption tax rate from 8 per cent to 10 per cent in April 2017 in order to achieve primary balance by financial year 2020. But this would require significant economic recovery.

In order to boost growth, the government announced the new ‘three arrows’ of Abe’s economic policy. These focus on building the foundations for economic growth, namely a target of a 20 per cent increase in GDP to JPY600 trillion (US$4.9 trillion) by 2020, child-rearing assistance to boost the low birth rate and social security measures to increase nursing facilities for the elderly.

But the majority of Japan remains pessimistic and does not believe that the economy will improve under Abenomics. Abe and his government have not been successful in gaining public confidence on economic policy. This suggests that, ultimately, the economy may determine the fate of his cabinet.

2015 could indeed be remembered as a glorious year for Shinzo Abe — but it may yet turn out very differently.

About the author

Nobumasa Akiyama is Professor at the Graduate Law School and the School of International and Public Policy, Hitotsubashi University.

About AJRC

The Australia-Japan Research Centre (AJRC) at Crawford School of Public Policy conducts research to explore and improve understanding of the economies and economic policy processes in Australia and Japan and both countries' strategic interests in the Asia Pacific economy. Its policy-oriented areas of interest cover developments in regional economic cooperation and integration and encompass research on trade, finance, macroeconomics and structural and regulatory reform, as well as international economic relations.

Recent publications

  • Japan’s Abenomics bumps along
    By Hugh Patrick
    AJIR Forum
    No.12, 2015
    » download
  • Will Japan’s corporate governance reform work?`
    By Bruce Greenwald
    AJIR Forum
    No.11, 2015
    » download
  • Has Japan’s corporate governance reform worked?
    By Masao Nakamura
    AJIR Forum
    No.10, 2015
    » download
  • Sino–Japanese economic embrace is warm enough to thaw the politics
    By Shiro Armstrong
    AJIR Forum
    No.9, 2015
    » download

Contact AJRC

(T) +61 2 6125 0168
(F) +61 2 6125 8448
(E) ajrc@anu.edu.au

Australia-Japan Research Centre (AJRC)
Crawford School of Public Policy
ANU College of Asia & the Pacific

J.G. Crawford Building No. 132
Lennox Crossing Road
The Australian National University
Canberra ACT 0200 Australia

Disclaimer:

No part of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part without written permission from the Executive Director of the Australia Japan Research Centre.

The views and opinions expressed in this publication reflect the author's point of view only and not necessarily those of the Australia Japan Research Centre and the Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.


The Australian National University, Canberra | CRICOS Provider : 00120C | ABN : 52 234 063 906


If you do not wish to receive future emails from us, please unsubscribe.